قَوۡمُکَ
Appears 3 times in Quran
Occurrences in Quran
Found 3 verses containing "قَوۡمُکَ".
وَکَذَّبَ بِہٖ قَوۡمُکَ وَہُوَ الۡحَقُّ ۚ قُل لَّسۡتُ عَلَیۡکُمۡ بِوَکِیۡلٍ
6:6.
39:42; 42:7.
The pronoun "it" refers to (1) the matter under discussion; (2) the Qur’an; (3) Divine punishment. Taking the last meaning, the words "it is the truth" would mean that the promised punishment is sure to come.
6:6.
39:42; 42:7.
Commentary:
The pronoun "it" in the words "rejected it" refers either (1) to the matter under discussion, i.e. it is God alone Who can send down punishment, or (2) to the Quran, or (3) to punishment. Taking the last meaning, the words "it is the truth" would mean that the promised punishment is sure to come.
The words, I am not a guardian over you, imply that if now, when I have conveyed to you the Divine Message, the punishment of God comes, I cannot help it. I will not be able to protect you from it. It is worthy of note that whereas disbelievers are demanding punishment, the Holy Prophet is expressing sympathy for them.
b
6:6.
c
39:42; 42:7.
430
代词 “它” 指的是: (1) 正在讨论的那件事; (2) «古兰经»; (3) 安拉的惩罚。以最后一个意义解释, “它是真理” 的意思是, 那约定的惩罚是肯定要来的。
a
6:6.
b
39:42; 42:7.
812
Commentary:
The pronoun "it" in the words "rejected it" refers either (1) to the matter under discussion, i.e. it is God alone Who can send down punishment, or (2) to the Quran, or (3) to punishment. Taking the last meaning, the words "it is the truth" would mean that the promised punishment is sure to come.
The words, I am not a guardian over you, imply that if now, when I have conveyed to you the Divine Message, the punishment of God comes, I cannot help it. I will not be able to protect you from it. It is worthy of note that whereas disbelievers are demanding punishment, the Holy Prophet is expressing sympathy for them.
b
6:6.
c
39:42; 42:7.
860
The pronoun "it" refers to (1) the matter under discussion; (2) the Qur’an; (3) Divine punishment. Taking the last meaning, the words "it is the truth" would mean that the promised punishment is sure to come.
تِلۡکَ مِنۡ اَنۡۢبَآءِ الۡغَیۡبِ نُوۡحِیۡہَاۤ اِلَیۡکَ ۖ مَا کُنۡتَ تَعۡلَمُہَاۤ اَنۡتَ وَلَا قَوۡمُکَ مِنۡ قَبۡلِ ہٰذَا ۖ فَاصۡبِرۡ ۖ اِنَّ الۡعٰقِبَۃَ لِلۡمُتَّقِیۡنَ
«古兰经» 叙述各个先知, 并不是只谈他们的生平事迹。«古兰经» 谈到他们, 因为他们含有先知的隐喻, 他们的许多类似的大事, 在穆圣本人的生活中也都发生了。
یعنی یہ نوحؑ کا قصہ بیان نہیں ہو رہا بلکہ محمد رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی قوم پر آنے والے عذاب کی خبر دی جا رہی ہے۔
The Quranic accounts of the various Prophets are not meant as mere stories. They are given in the Qur’an because they contain a prophetic allusion to the analogous events that were to occur in the life of the Holy Prophet himself.
Commentary:
The words, This is of the tidings of the unseen, are intended to hint that the Quranic accounts of the various Prophets are not meant as mere stories of the ancient peoples. They are given in the Quran because they contain a prophetic allusion to the analogous events that were to occur in the life of the Holy Prophet himself. This is what is implied in the words "the tidings of the unseen". The concluding words of the verse, i.e. "the end is for the God-fearing," lend further support to this inference. These accounts also serve to warn Muslims that they too will have to pass through the experiences of the followers of former Prophets and they warn disbelievers that they too shall meet a fate similar to that of the rejecters of past Prophets.
The words, So be thou patient, mean that just as the people of Noah were destroyed, so will a section of the Holy Prophet’s people be destroyed; and then of their seed and of the seed of their companions God will raise a people who will bear the standard of piety and righteousness in every age.
The story of the Deluge with some variations is to be found in the traditions and literature of various countries (see Enc. Rel. & Eth. Enc. Bib. & Enc. Brit. under Deluge). The importance which is attached to it and the widespread credence it commands points to its being an historical event of very great importance. It cannot be denied that a great flood did take place sometime in the remote past, that it was of an extraordinary nature and that it affected many nations of the earth. Its description as given in the Quran, however, shows that there was nothing unnatural about it.
The catastrophe seems to have taken place somewhere at the dawn of human civilization. The Holy Prophet of Islam spoke of Noah as the first Messenger of God, i.e. the first organizer of a religious community (Bukhari, ch. on Anbiya’).The Bible also represents him as such (Gen. 6:8). Hindu traditions, too, corroborate this fact, for they speak of Manu (who is the same as Noah), the Hindu hero of the Deluge, as the first man (Enc. Brit. under Manu). But they add that seven others were saved with him, which points to the fact that he was not the first man absolutely but only the first man of the first cycle of human civilization. These statements made in the Scriptures of three great religions of the world leave no doubt about the fact that Noah laid the foundations of human civilization and culture. In fact, with the progress and advance of a people in civilization, their numbers also begin to grow with a corresponding decrease taking place in the numbers of less civilized communities living with them in the same land. It is a well-known historical fact that whenever a people, comparatively more advanced in culture and civilization, have come to settle in a country, they have either blotted out of existence the less civilized inhabitants of the land or have greatly weakened them. Thus it appears that when the descendants of Noah and those of his companions, who were the founders of human civilization, spread to other lands, because they were more powerful than the people already living there, they either exterminated them or absorbed them by breaking their power. In this way they must have introduced into all the countries they subjugated their own traditions and customs; and consequently the tradition about the Deluge which naturally impressed the subjugated people must also have come to be introduced into other lands. With the lapse of time, however, the immigrants ceased to have any connection with their original home and the catastrophe consequently came to be regarded as a local occurrence, with the result that local names of persons and places came to be substituted for the original names.
In short, the Deluge was not a universal visitation, nor should the traditions of different lands be taken to point to separate floods. It was confined to one land, but owing to the immigration of the descendants of Noah and his companions to other lands, the story spread far and wide and finally the Flood came to be regarded as a local occurrence in every country.
As for the place where the Deluge occurred see note on al-Judi in v. 45.
615
«古兰经» 叙述各个先知, 并不是只谈他们的生平事迹。«古兰经» 谈到他们, 因为他们含有先知的隐喻, 他们的许多类似的大事, 在穆圣本人的生活中也都发生了。
3
یعنی یہ نوحؑ کا قصہ بیان نہیں ہو رہا بلکہ محمد رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی قوم پر آنے والے عذاب کی خبر دی جا رہی ہے۔
1430
Commentary:
The words, This is of the tidings of the unseen, are intended to hint that the Quranic accounts of the various Prophets are not meant as mere stories of the ancient peoples. They are given in the Quran because they contain a prophetic allusion to the analogous events that were to occur in the life of the Holy Prophet himself. This is what is implied in the words "the tidings of the unseen". The concluding words of the verse, i.e. "the end is for the God-fearing," lend further support to this inference. These accounts also serve to warn Muslims that they too will have to pass through the experiences of the followers of former Prophets and they warn disbelievers that they too shall meet a fate similar to that of the rejecters of past Prophets.
The words, So be thou patient, mean that just as the people of Noah were destroyed, so will a section of the Holy Prophet’s people be destroyed; and then of their seed and of the seed of their companions God will raise a people who will bear the standard of piety and righteousness in every age.
The story of the Deluge with some variations is to be found in the traditions and literature of various countries (see Enc. Rel. & Eth. Enc. Bib. & Enc. Brit. under Deluge). The importance which is attached to it and the widespread credence it commands points to its being an historical event of very great importance. It cannot be denied that a great flood did take place sometime in the remote past, that it was of an extraordinary nature and that it affected many nations of the earth. Its description as given in the Quran, however, shows that there was nothing unnatural about it.
The catastrophe seems to have taken place somewhere at the dawn of human civilization. The Holy Prophet of Islam spoke of Noah as the first Messenger of God, i.e. the first organizer of a religious community (Bukhari, ch. on Anbiya’).The Bible also represents him as such (Gen. 6:8). Hindu traditions, too, corroborate this fact, for they speak of Manu (who is the same as Noah), the Hindu hero of the Deluge, as the first man (Enc. Brit. under Manu). But they add that seven others were saved with him, which points to the fact that he was not the first man absolutely but only the first man of the first cycle of human civilization. These statements made in the Scriptures of three great religions of the world leave no doubt about the fact that Noah laid the foundations of human civilization and culture. In fact, with the progress and advance of a people in civilization, their numbers also begin to grow with a corresponding decrease taking place in the numbers of less civilized communities living with them in the same land. It is a well-known historical fact that whenever a people, comparatively more advanced in culture and civilization, have come to settle in a country, they have either blotted out of existence the less civilized inhabitants of the land or have greatly weakened them. Thus it appears that when the descendants of Noah and those of his companions, who were the founders of human civilization, spread to other lands, because they were more powerful than the people already living there, they either exterminated them or absorbed them by breaking their power. In this way they must have introduced into all the countries they subjugated their own traditions and customs; and consequently the tradition about the Deluge which naturally impressed the subjugated people must also have come to be introduced into other lands. With the lapse of time, however, the immigrants ceased to have any connection with their original home and the catastrophe consequently came to be regarded as a local occurrence, with the result that local names of persons and places came to be substituted for the original names.
In short, the Deluge was not a universal visitation, nor should the traditions of different lands be taken to point to separate floods. It was confined to one land, but owing to the immigration of the descendants of Noah and his companions to other lands, the story spread far and wide and finally the Flood came to be regarded as a local occurrence in every country.
As for the place where the Deluge occurred see note on al-Judi in v. 45.
1322
The Quranic accounts of the various Prophets are not meant as mere stories. They are given in the Qur’an because they contain a prophetic allusion to the analogous events that were to occur in the life of the Holy Prophet himself.
۞ وَلَمَّا ضُرِبَ ابۡنُ مَرۡیَمَ مَثَلًا اِذَا قَوۡمُکَ مِنۡہُ یَصِدُّوۡنَ
یعنی قرآن مجید میں ابن مریم کے دوبارہ آنے کی خبر جب پڑھتے ہیں تو شور مچا دیتے ہیں کہ کیا وہ ہمارے معبودوں سے اچھا ہے کہ ہمارے معبودوں کو تو جہنم میں پھینکا جاتا ہے اور اسے دنیا کی اصلاح کے لئے واپس لایا جاتا ہے۔ حالانکہ دونوں واقعات میں زمین و آسمان کا فرق ہے۔ مسیحؑ خود اپنی بندگی کا اقرار کرتا ہے اور وہ مرد صالح تھا اس کا مقابلہ مشرکوں یا مشرکوں کے سرداروں سے نہیں ہو سکتا۔
Sadda (Yasuddu) means, he hindered him from a thing; and Sadda (Yasiddu) means, he raised a clamour (Aqrab).
Important Words:
یصدون (raise a clamour) is derived from صد. They say صدہ عن کذا, aorist یصد (yasuddu) i.e. he hindered him from such a thing; he turned him away from it. صد aorist یصد (yasiddu) means, he raised a clamour; he cried (Aqrab).
Commentary:
The main theme of this Surah, as already mentioned, is the Unity of God. The Surah condemns idolatry in very strong terms. But in the case of Jesus who is also worshipped as God by Christians, it has made an exception. Not only has it not condemned him but has actually mentioned his name with great respect. This invidious distinction (as it appeared to the Quraish of Mecca) between Jesus and their idols cut them to the quick. The verse under comment refers to this mortification of the Quraish. The exception made in case of Jesus needed some explanation. The explanation is given in the verses that follow.
The word مثلا signifying anything similar, like, equal to another (6:39), the verse, besides the meaning given in the text, may also signify that when the people of the Holy Prophet—the Muslims—are told that another person who would be like Jesus and would be his counterpart would be raised from among them to regenerate them and restore their lost spiritual glory, they, instead of being glad over this good tidings, raise a clamour. The verse may thus be taken as referring to the Second Coming of Jesus, which has taken place in the person of Ahmad, the Promised Messiah.
1
یعنی قرآن مجید میں ابن مریم کے دوبارہ آنے کی خبر جب پڑھتے ہیں تو شور مچا دیتے ہیں کہ کیا وہ ہمارے معبودوں سے اچھا ہے کہ ہمارے معبودوں کو تو جہنم میں پھینکا جاتا ہے اور اسے دنیا کی اصلاح کے لئے واپس لایا جاتا ہے۔ حالانکہ دونوں واقعات میں زمین و آسمان کا فرق ہے۔ مسیحؑ خود اپنی بندگی کا اقرار کرتا ہے اور وہ مرد صالح تھا اس کا مقابلہ مشرکوں یا مشرکوں کے سرداروں سے نہیں ہو سکتا۔
3678
Important Words:
یصدون (raise a clamour) is derived from صد. They say صدہ عن کذا, aorist یصد (yasuddu) i.e. he hindered him from such a thing; he turned him away from it. صد aorist یصد (yasiddu) means, he raised a clamour; he cried (Aqrab).
Commentary:
The main theme of this Surah, as already mentioned, is the Unity of God. The Surah condemns idolatry in very strong terms. But in the case of Jesus who is also worshipped as God by Christians, it has made an exception. Not only has it not condemned him but has actually mentioned his name with great respect. This invidious distinction (as it appeared to the Quraish of Mecca) between Jesus and their idols cut them to the quick. The verse under comment refers to this mortification of the Quraish. The exception made in case of Jesus needed some explanation. The explanation is given in the verses that follow.
The word مثلا signifying anything similar, like, equal to another (6:39), the verse, besides the meaning given in the text, may also signify that when the people of the Holy Prophet—the Muslims—are told that another person who would be like Jesus and would be his counterpart would be raised from among them to regenerate them and restore their lost spiritual glory, they, instead of being glad over this good tidings, raise a clamour. The verse may thus be taken as referring to the Second Coming of Jesus, which has taken place in the person of Ahmad, the Promised Messiah.
2682
Sadda (Yasuddu) means, he hindered him from a thing; and Sadda (Yasiddu) means, he raised a clamour (Aqrab).